The New York Times ran an op-ed [Download NY Times oped.doc]
piece critical of the SAT test accomodations for students with disabilities. This op-ed piece just glosses over the real reasons students get test accommodations—they need them because of a bona fide disability. It reads as if students who request accommodations are looking for a leg up when they do not deserve it. Some time ago another mother told my wife how lucky she was to park close in a handicapped spot in the parking lot. People do not see what is in front of them–accommodations based upon real and long standing need. In the case of SATs would more time make a difference for the student who is not prepared or even for the prepared non-disabled student ? It only makes a difference for the student with a disability who truly needs and benefits from testing accommodations.
Thank you to Liz Ditz for sending this story to my attention.